Timeline of tyrannosaur research


This timeline of tyrannosaur research is a chronological listing of events in the history of paleontology focused on the tyrannosaurs, a group of predatory theropod dinosaurs that began as small, long-armed bird-like creatures with elaborate cranial ornamentation but achieved apex predator status during the Late Cretaceous as their arms shrank and body size expanded. Although formally trained scientists did not begin to study tyrannosaur fossils until the :Category:19th century in paleontology|mid-19th century, these remains may have been discovered by Native Americans and interpreted through a mythological lens. The Montana Crow tradition about thunder birds with two claws on their feet may have been inspired by isolated tyrannosaurid forelimbs found locally. Other legends possibly inspired by tyrannosaur remains include Cheyenne stories about a mythical creature called the Ahke, and Delaware stories about smoking the bones of ancient monsters to have wishes granted.
Tyrannosaur remains were among the first dinosaur fossils collected in the United States. The first of these was named Deinodon horridus by Joseph Leidy. However, as this species was based only on teeth the name would fall into disuse. Soon after, Edward Drinker Cope described Laelaps aquilunguis from a partial skeleton in New Jersey. Its discovery heralded the realization that carnivorous dinosaurs were bipeds, unlike the lizardlike megalosaurs sculpted for the Crystal Palace. Laelaps was also among the first dinosaurs to be portrayed artistically as a vigorous, active animal, presaging the Dinosaur Renaissance by decades. Later in the century, Cope's hated rival Othniel Charles Marsh would discover that the name Laelaps had already been given to a parasitic mite, and would rename the dinosaur Dryptosaurus.
Early in the :Category: 20th century in paleontology|20th century, Tyrannosaurus itself was discovered by Barnum Brown and named by Henry Fairfield Osborn, who would recognize it as a representative of a distinct family of dinosaurs he called the Tyrannosauridae. Tyrannosaur taxonomy would be controversial for many decades afterward. One controversy centered around the use of the name Tyrannosauridae for this family, as the name "Deinodontidae" had already been proposed. The name Tyrannosauridae came out victorious following arguments put forth by Dale Russell in 1970. The other major controversy regarding tyrannosaur taxonomy was the family's evolutionary relationships. Early in the history of paleontology, it was assumed that the large carnivorous dinosaurs were all part of one evolutionary lineage, while the small carnivorous dinosaurs were part of a separate lineage. Tyrannosaurid anatomy led some early researchers like Matthew, Brown, and Huene, to cast doubt on the validity of this division. However, the traditional carnosaur-coelurosaur division persisted until the early :Category:1990s in paleontology|1990s, when the application of cladistics to tyrannosaur systematics confirmed the doubts of early workers and found tyrannosaurs to be large-bodied coelurosaurs.
Another debate about tyrannosaurs would not be settled until the early 21st century: their diet. Early researchers were so overwhelmed by the massive bulk of Tyrannosaurus that some, like Lawrence Lambe, were skeptical that it was even capable of hunting down live prey and assumed that it lived as a scavenger. This view continued to be advocated into the 1990s by Jack Horner but was shown false by Kenneth Carpenter, who reported the discovery of a partially healed tyrannosaur bite wound on an Edmontosaurus annectens tail vertebra, proving that T. rex at least sometimes pursued living victims.

Prescientific

1850s

1856
1865
1866
1868
1876
1877
1884
1890
1892

1900s

1900
1902
1905
1914
1917
1922
.
1923
1928
1930
1932
1933
1946
1955
1956
1958
1964
1970
1974
.
1975
1976
1977
1978
1979
1980
1981
.
1983
1986
  • Jacques Gauthier classified tyrannosaurs as carnosaurs.
  • Robert T. Bakker interpreted the "ornamentation" seen on the snouts and around the eyes of many tyrannosaurs were displays for other members of the same tyrannosaur species.
1988
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
.
1996
1997
  • Richard Cifelli and others reported teeth from Utah that exhibited the distinctive thickening characterizing tyrannosaurid teeth that date back to the Albian-Cenomanian boundary. As such, they were the oldest known tyrannosaurid teeth.
  • Kirkland and others reported teeth from Utah that exhibited the distinctive thickening characterizing tyrannosaurid teeth that date back to the Albian-Cenomanian boundary. As such, they were the oldest known tyrannosaurid teeth.
  • Sereno concluded that the evolutionary history of tyrannosaurids suggested a relatively complex history of biogeographic dispersal between Asia and North America.
  • Horner and Dobb interpreted tyrannosaurids as scavengers.
1998
.
1999

2000s

2000
.
  • Mark Norell and others found tyrannosaurids to lie outside of the maniraptoriformes. In other words, they are less closely related to birds than the ostrich dinosaurs are.
2001
Thomas R. Holtz, Jr. published a cladistic analysis of the Tyrannosauridae. Holtz defined the Tyrannosauridae in his analysis as "all descendants of the most recent common ancestor of Tyrannosaurus and Aublysodon." He concluded that the Tyrannosauridae had two subfamilies, a more primitive Aublysodontinae and the tyrannosaurinae. He defined the former as "Aublysodon and all taxa sharing a more recent common ancestor with it than with Tyrannosaurus." . He observed that these dinosaurs were distinguished by their unserrated premaxillary teeth. The Tyrannosaurinae he defined as "Tyrannosaurus and all taxa sharing a more recent common ancestor with it than with Aublysodon."
Holtz considered these definitions only tentative due to the scant remains representing most taxa in the Aublysodontinae. Holtz also noted that the lack of serrations on aublyodontines' premaxillary teeth could have been caused by tooth wear in life, postmortem abrasion, or digestion. Alternatively "Aublysodontine"-type teeth could be from an ontogenetic stage or sexual morph of another kind of tyrannosaur. Holtz also expressed the taxonomic opinion that Nanotyrannus lancensis was a juvenile T. rex. The results of his phylogenetic analysis of the Tyrannosauridae are reproduced below:


2002
.
2003
2004
2005
.
2006
2009
2010
2011
.
2012
2013

Cladogram of tyrannosaurs from Loewen et al. 2013



.
.
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020