Takaful
Takaful is a co-operative system of reimbursement or repayment in case of loss, organized as an Islamic or sharia compliant alternative to conventional insurance, which Takaful proponents believe contains forbidden riba and gharar.
Under takaful, people and companies concerned about hazards make regular contributions to be reimbursed or repaid to members in the event of loss, and managed on their behalf by a takaful operator. Like other Islamic finance products, Takaful is grounded in Islamic Muamalat.
In 2018, the takaful industry had grown to a size of $27.7 billion of "contributions". The movement has been praised as providing "superior alternatives" to insurance that "reinvigorate human capital, emphasize personal
dignity, community self-help, and economic self-development"; but also criticized as having "dwindled" in scope to an industry of "conventional insurance with Arabic terminology and language of contract".
Principles
Theoretically, takaful is perceived as cooperative or mutual insurance, where members contribute a certain sum of money to a common pool. The purpose of this system is not profits, but to uphold the principle of "bear ye one another's burden". The principles of takaful are as follows:- Policyholders cooperate among themselves for their common good.
- Policyholders' contributions are considered as donations to the fund.
- Every policyholder pays his subscription to help those who need assistance.
- Losses are divided and liabilities spread according to the community pooling system.
- Uncertainty is eliminated concerning subscription and compensation.
- It does not derive advantage at the cost of others.
Fiqh scholars
In its second session, the Fiqh Academy of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation ruled conventional commercial insurance haram. Its ninth resolution stated:The commercial insurance contract, with a fixed insurance premium, as practiced by commercial insurance companies, contains substantial gharar, which renders the contract defective. Consequently, it is legally forbidden.
Argument against conventional insurance
Islamic scholars began forbidding commercial insurance as early as the late nineteenth century C.E. Orthodox Islamic scholars believe commercial insurance is disallowed for Muslims because it contains- Al-Gharar
- Al-Maisir
- Riba
- The uncertainty "if and when the insured event will take place and, if it does take place, what would be the relationship of compensation to the insurance premium paid". This "makes the insurance business similar to gambling, where the gambler does not know the fate of the game". Thus, uncertainty in the conventional insurance business "is excessive and borders on prohibited gharar".
- "Insurance companies invest surplus funds on the basis of interest and pay out a part of such earnings to policyholders as bonuses." According to the 'orthodox interpretation', this is riba.
Defense of conventional insurance
Scriptural basis
Islamic scholars supporting takaful point to Qur'anand several sayings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. Some examples are:
;Qur'an
Basis of Co-operation: Help one another in al-Birr and in al-Taqwa, but do not help one another in sin and transgression.
;Hadith
- God will always help his servant for as long as he helps others.
- Basis of Responsibility: The place of relationships and feelings of people with faith, between each other, is just like the body; when one of its parts is afflicted with pain, then the rest of the body will be affected.
- One true Muslim and another true Muslim are like a building, whereby every part in it strengthens the other part.
- Basis of Mutual Protection: By my life, nobody will enter Paradise if he does not protect his neighbour who is in distress.
Takaful industry and models
History
The concept of takaful has reportedly been practised in various forms since 622 AD. Muslim jurists acknowledge that the basis of shared responsibility laid the foundation of mutual insurance."In the case of insurance, as with commercial banks, orthodox opinion prevailed," and with "a consensus among Muslim scholars" about the legitimacy of takaful and the illegitimacy of conventional insurance, the "movement for Islamizing the contemporary insurance business" started around the mid-1970s. In 1976, a fatwa was issued by the Higher Council of Saudi Arabia "in favor of an Islamic model" of insurance. The International Islamic Fiqh Academy, Jeddah of the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation also approved takaful as a legitimate form of business in 1985. The Islamic Insurance Company of Sudan started as the first takaful company in 1979. By the mid 1990s, there were seven takaful companies in Sudan, Dubai, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Jordan.
The industry grew from $1.384 billion in 2004 to $5.318 billion in 2008. By the end of 2011, total takaful contributions amounted to $12 billion.
In 2005, there were 82 companies around the world engaged in takaful business. By 2006, there were 133.
As with the traditional forms of insurance, reinsurance of a takaful operation may be used, known as "retakaful". Also in 2006, AIG, a non-Muslim US-based company, established a takaful subsidiary called AIG Takaful Enaya, headquartered in Bahrain.
As of 2013 the leading takaful countries are "Malaysia and the Gulf states". It was reported in 2016 that out of total 308 takaful companies, 93 are takaful windows; however, these takaful windows own only 2.5% of the total takaful assets.
Models
There are several models of how takaful can be implemented:- Mudharabah model : the managers are sharing profit and losses with the policyhoders; used initially in Far East.
- Tabarru'
-based: "donations", i.e. premiums, are accumulated into a fund to meet members' losses. Members are not allowed to take back any contributions or profits from investments. - A combination of Tabarru' and Mudharabah: Bahrain, UAE and Middle East countries.
- Wakala model: agency fee, received up front from the contributors and transferred to shareholders fund.
- Al Waqf-based model: Waqf is a distinct entity and a legal person. According to one critic, "except for names and terms, the essence" of both Al Waqf takaful and conventional insurance is the same, and as a consequence this structure "has come under a lot of criticism from Shari'ah scholars". Mainly used in Pakistan and South Africa.
The ''Mudharabah'' model (profit-sharing)
In order to eliminate the element of uncertainty in the takaful contract, the concept of tabarru'
In essence, tabarru' enables participants to perform their deeds in assisting fellow participants who might suffer a loss or damage due to a catastrophe or disaster. The sharing of profit that may emerge from the operations of a takaful is made only after the obligation of assisting the fellow participants has been fulfilled. It is imperative, therefore, for a takaful operator to maintain adequate assets of the defined funds under its care whilst striving prudently to ensure the funds are sufficiently protected against over-exposure. Therefore, the provision of insurance coverage is in conformity with Shariah based on the Islamic principles of al-takaful and al-mudharabah.
Al-mudharabah is the commercial profit-sharing contract between the provider or providers of funds for a business venture and the entrepreneur who actually conducts the business. The operation of a takaful may thus be envisaged as the profit-sharing business venture between the takaful operator and the individual members of a group of participants who desire to reciprocally guarantee each other against a certain loss or damage that may be inflicted upon any one of them.
Criticism
One complaint made against takaful is that despite the talk of solidarity, takaful-holders "do not have any 'voice'" in the management of the takaful. The "TO makes all the crucial decisions, such as rate of premium, risk strategy, asset management and allocation of surpluses and profits". The shareholders of the TO, and "not the takaful-holders, appoint and dismiss managers of the takaful". Similarly, Mahmud El-Gamal complains that "even companies that use the term takaful ta'āwun are structured with stockholder rather than policyholder ownership", despite the 9/2 ruling of the International Islamic Fiqh Academy that permitted insurance as "cooperative insurance, built on the principles of voluntary contribution and mutual cooperation". An exception to this state of affairs can be found in Sudan, where the takaful-holders have more say in the management of the takaful business.Whether takaful is significantly different from conventional insurance has been questioned. Islamic economist Mohammad Najatuallah Siddiqui writes that
"The form of organization chosen to take advantage of the law of large numbers does not change the reality. We can make insurance a not-for-profit activity, but it does not change the essential nature of what is being done."
According to Rakaan Kayali, the fact that benefits for the takaful members are distributed as funds allow, rather than defined by the policy, may lead to conflict among members — if, for example, one member's claim uses up takaful funds so that another member with an equally valid claim a short time later is not compensated, or not compensated in full.
Additionally, there has been doubt cast on the legitimacy of claiming that takaful participants are making "donations". This is because the word "donations" implies giving with no expectation of worldly return. This is clearly not the case with takaful participants who are seeking insurance.