Serial verb construction


The serial verb construction, also known as serialization or verb stacking, is a syntactic phenomenon in which two or more verbs or verb phrases are strung together in a single clause. It is a common feature of many African, Asian and New Guinean languages. Serial verb constructions are often described as coding a single event; they can also be used to indicate concurrent or causally-related events.

Uses

The terms "serial verbs", "serialization", etc. are used by different authors to denote somewhat different sets of constructions. There are also differences in how the constructions are analyzed, in terms of both syntax and semantics.
In general, a structure described as a serial verb construction will consist either of two consecutive verbs or of two or more consecutive verb phrases in which each verb may have its own object and possibly other modifiers. There will usually be no marking, by means of affixes or subordinating conjunctions, that one verb is dependent on the other, and they will not be linked by coordinating conjunctions. Some linguists insist that serial verbs cannot be dependent on each other; however, if a language does not mark dependent verbs with affixation, it can be hard to determine whether any dependency relation exists when verbs appear in sequence.
Serial verbs normally denote actions that are closely connected and can be considered to be part of the same event. They may be actions taking place simultaneously, or one may represent the cause, purpose or result of the other. In most cases, the serial verbs in a sequence are understood to share the same subject.
Certain expressions resembling serial verb construction are found in English, such as let's go eat and come live with me. In such constructions, the second verb would normally be regarded as a bare infinitive.

Examples with consecutive verbs

The following example of serialization comes from the Nupe language from Nigeria:
The two verbs bé and lá appear consecutively, with no linking word or anything else to indicate that one verb is subordinate to the other. The subject, "Musa", is understood to apply to both verbs. In this example, the second verb also has a direct object. Note that in the English version given, the second verb is translated by an infinitive, "to take", which is marked as subordinate to the first verb.
Depending on the language, the shared subject may be marked on both verbs or only one. In most of the examples, it is marked only once. However, in the following example from the Baré, in the Upper Amazon, the first person singular subject is marked twice:
A similar construction is also found in most varieties of dialectal Arabic. The following example is from Lebanese Arabic:
As a rule, serial verbs cannot be marked independently for categories such as tense, aspect and mood. Either all of the verbs are marked for the same features, or a sole marker is shared by all of them. In the Hindi label=none fon uṭhā-kar kahā, "picked up the phone and said", only the second verb is marked as past tense, but both are understood to refer to the past. In the following example, from the West African Ewe, both verbs appear in their perfective form:
In Japanese, two verbs may come together with the first verb in the continuative form, as in 2=押し通る, in which oshi is the continuative form of osu, and tōru is a finite form whose present tense and indicative mood are understood to apply to oshi. Similarly, 2=飛び込む in which tobi is from tobu, and komu means "go in"; 2=出来上がる, where deki is from dekiru and agaru means "rise, be offered". No arguments can come between the two verbs in this construction.
In the case of negation, only one negator can be applied to the whole serial construction, as in the following Baré example:
In Chinese, as in Southeast Asian languages, when a transitive verb is followed by an intransitive verb, the object of the combined verb may be understood as the object of the first verb and the subject of the second: "the tiger bit Zhang to death", where Zhang is understood as the direct object of yǎo but as the subject of sǐ. In the equivalent construction in Hindi, the one who dies would be the tiger, not Zhang.
In the following example from Maonan, a language spoken in the southeast of China, up to ten verbs co-occur in a sentence coding a single event without any linking words, coordinating conjunctions or any other markings:

Examples with intervening elements between verbs

In some languages that have verb serialization, the verbs must appear consecutively with nothing intervening. In other languages, however, it is possible for arguments, normally the object of one of the verbs, to come in between the serialized verbs. The resulting construction is a sequence of verb phrases rather than of plain verbs. The following example is from the Nigerian Yoruba:
The object of the first verb intervenes between the verbs, resulting in two consecutive verb phrases, the first meaning "took the book", the second "came". As before, the subject is understood to apply to both verbs. The combined action of taking the book and coming can be translated as "bringing" the book.
A serial verb construction may be used to introduce an actant :
In Japanese also, strings of verb phrases can be created, often denoting events that are related causally or in time. Such strings may be translated into English by using "and", "while", " to" or other connectives, but some may have a more compact translation, as in the following example in which the actions of "following" and "coming" are simultaneous:
The following sentence from Mandarin Chinese can be considered to contain four verb phrases in sequence:
In Chinese, however, there is often no clear distinction between serial verb phrases and prepositional phrases. The first three "verbs" in the above sentence may alternatively be regarded as prepositions. Words used in that way in Chinese and in some other languages are commonly referred to as coverbs.

Contrast with compound verbs

A distinction is sometimes made between serial verbs and compound verbs. In a compound verb, the first element generally carries most of the semantic load, while the second element, often called a vector verb or explicator verb, provides fine distinctions and carries the inflection. For example, Hindi:
In this example, लिया liyā is a vector verb that indicates a completed action, while खा khā "eat" is the main or primary verb. Compare this to the following:
Again, खा khā "eat" is the main verb. However, in this example डाला ḍālā is the vector verb, indicating recklessness or an unwanted action. Both खा लिया khā liyā and खा डाला khā ḍālā alternate with the corresponding perfective form of the main verb under partly specifiable semantic and pragmatic conditions. For instance, negation often suppresses compound verbs in favor of their non-compound counterparts:
This sentence makes use of the vector verb लेना lenā, which may be dropped in the negative:
Here only the main verb is retained.