Meenakshi Jain
Meenakshi Jain is an Indian political scientist and historian. A scholar on relations between caste and politics, she is currently an associate professor of history at Gargi College, Delhi.
Jain wrote a groundbreaking volume on the practice of Sati in colonial India and had also authored a history textbook, which incurred significant scholarly criticism but went on to replace a previous text by Romila Thapar.
In 2014, she was nominated as a member of the Indian Council of Historical Research by the Indian government. In 2020, she was conferred with the Padma Shri, India's fourth highest civilian award, for her work in the field of literature and education.
Early life and education
Meenakshi Jain is the daughter of journalist Girilal Jain, a former editor of The Times of India. She received her Ph.D. in political science from the University of Delhi. Her thesis on the social base and relations between caste and politics was published in 1991.Career
Jain is an associate professor of history at Gargi College, affiliated to the University of Delhi. In December 2014, she was nominated as a member of the Indian Council of Historical Research by the Indian government.Reception
Martha Nussbaum
Writing in The Clash Within: Democracy, Religious Violence, and India's Future, distinguished philosopher Martha Nussbaum noted Jain to be an amateur historian, who was trained as a sociologist and was yet to publish any significant work but was inducted into the ranks of a historian to fulfill a political mission. Recalling an interview, wherein she asked Jain about historiographic uncertainties faced whilst writing Medieval India, Nussbaum noted her to have a strongly dogmatic persona who entirely lacked in any puzzlement or a sense of difficulty—two desirable traits in a good scholar.Nussbaum found Jain's Medieval India to poorly represent the complexity of the medieval period—a simple ideologically-based uni-dimensional war-narrative between the forces of good and evil, that did not highlight the tensions and internal conflicts between seemingly homogeneous groups. Yet she found her work to be a small "oasis of intelligence", subtlety and literacy, when contrasted with other publications of the NCERT series.
She similarly faulted and criticized multiple aspects of Jain's review of Somanatha: Many Voices of a History and noted that the heavy dose of "dogmatic ideology" contained in it, made her serious points less convincing.
Nussbaum noted that Jain's rebut to the criticisms of her works had integrity. Whilst she often skipped the broader issues, Jain admitted to some of her errors and often produced secondary scholarly source that had supported her writing, though the merit of the latter as an argument was debatable. She concluded that whilst Jain remained intellectually ahead of other right-wing historians and had genuine scholarly passions, she was inserted into the wrong domain by political forces and was compelled to produce a sub-standard work in a short time span.
Others
Sociologist Nandini Sundar noted that the exactions of the Sultanate rulers and the Mughals were portrayed from an anti-Hindu perspective in Jain's Medieval India whilst their legacy contributions to the society, culture and polity were ignored. She saw this as part of a broader pattern of state-induced historical negationism to suit the need of Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh. John Stratton Hawley of Columbia University found the book going against the grain in its treatment of the Bhakti movement in that she presented the movement as a response to Shankaracharya's monism rather than to the egalitarian message of Islam.Kancha Ilaiah noted of her to be a right wing historian who advocated for the theory that the caste system of India was a British legacy in contrary to the consensus of mainstream scholars, in a bid to shape public opinion against reservations in India.
Professor Pralay Kanungo, of Jawaharlal Nehru University, noted Jain's Rama and Ayodhya as a subtle and sophisticated work that can't be outright dismissed and managed to stand apart, when contrasted with the earlier propaganda attempts by Hindutva historians. He noted that a majority of the book was devoted to attacking left-leaning anti-Hindutva historians and by cherry-picking random content from random sources coupled with stray extrapolations, she had managed to produce a useful compilation but not an authentic history. Kanungo also pointed out other significant errors including her rejecting of the established scholarly consensus about the existence of multiple versions of Ramayanas et al. He also deemed Jain's Medieval India to be the sole face-saving volume in the entire NCERT history series, that was published by the newly elected NDA government.
A review over the Indian Historical Review praised Sati: Evangelicals, Baptist Missionaries, and the Changing Colonial Discourse as a well-researched and cogent magnum opus, that was thoroughly packed with facts, analysis and sources. Another review over Studies in World Christianity was positive as well.
Professor Abhinav Prakash Singh, of the University of Delhi, noted Flight of Deities and Rebirth of Temples: Episodes from Indian History to be a brilliant work.
Works
;Books- Congress Party, 1967-77: Role of Caste in Indian Politics,.
- Medieval India: A Textbook for Class XI,.
- Rajah-Moonje Pact: Documents On A Forgotten Chapter Of Indian History,.
- Parallel Pathways: Essays on Hindu-Muslim Relations, 1707-1857,.
- The India They Saw,,,,.
- Rama and Ayodhya,.
- Sati: Evangelicals, Baptist Missionaries, and the Changing Colonial Discourse,
- The Battle for Rama: Case of the Temple at Ayodhya,.
- "Flight of Deities and Rebirth of Temples: Episodes from Indian History",.
- "Congress 1967: Strategies of Mobilisation in D. A. Low" in The Indian National Congress Centenary Hindsights, 1988.
- "Backward Castes and Social Change in U. P. and Bihar" in Srinivas, Caste: Its 20th Century Avatar .
- A review of Romila Thapar's Somanatha: Many Voices of a History over The Pioneer.