Groningen-class corvette
The Groningen class was a class of steam corvettes of the Royal Netherlands Navy. The class comprised Groningen, Citadel van Antwerpen and Vice-Admiraal Koopman
Dutch Naval Plans in the 1850s
Dutch reaction to the Screw Steam Ship
On 8 February 1855 Smit van den Broecke became the new Dutch Secretary for the navy. At the time the Dutch were in a difficult situation. Many countries had built screw-propelled steam ships that out-sailed and out-gunned everything the Dutch navy had. The Dutch navy also required a screw propelled fleet. The reaction by Smit van den Broecke was so quick that it probably reflected plans made earlier.Plan 1855
In May 1855 Smit van den Broecke presented an overall plan for the fleet at home and in the East Indies. The heaviest ships of the new fleet would be 3 screw steam frigates of 400 hp, 50 guns and 500 men, to be stationed in the Netherlands. The standard fighting warship for the East Indies would be a screw corvette of 250 hp, 12 30-pounders and 125 men, of which 12 would be built. For policing the many outposts in the Indies 15 sloops of 100 hp, 12 guns and 85 men would be built. These would be supplemented by small paddle ships that would navigate rivers and shallow waters. The ships of the Groningen class fitted the 250 hp corvettes of this plan.Characteristics of the Groningen class
The Groningen class was not characterized as a corvette in the 1855 plan. However, in 1857 it was generally characterized as a steam corvette or screw corvette. Photographs and technical drawings show the class was ship-rigged. The ship displacement was also in line with that of the Royal Navy corvettes. In 1857 the class was mentioned as screw steamships of the second class, while some smaller screw ships were mentioned as screw steam ships fourth class.Design
The designed beam of the Groningen class was limited. It made for a class of rather slender and fast ships. In 1859 Tideman claimed that the stiffness of the hull of the lead ship Groningen was 'only just satisfactory'. Indeed the Groningen would be declared unfit in 1863, after serving only 6 years.The Citadel van Antwerpen was built according to the rules for calculating dimensions, weights and shapes for a steam corvette described by Tideman in his 1859 work. Both the Citadel and the Koopman were significantly larger than the Groningen.
The Dutch National Archive has a lot of technical drawings of the Vice Admiraal Koopman. Technical drawings of the privately built Groningen are in the Maritime_Museum_Rotterdam
Armament
In the initial plans the armament of the Groningen class was given as 12 30-pounders. Such a vague statement was normal at a time when the armament could still change at a later time. In 1859 Tideman foresaw 4 * 30-pounder long No 1, 4 * 30-pounder long No 4 and 4 * 20 cm light grenade guns.. In 1862 rifled muzzle loaders were introduced in the Dutch Navy, and being relatively modern, the class was re-armed. In 1876 the armament of the class was given as 5 × 16 cm RML and 6 x 30-pounder Long No 2. Also in 1875 there was a claim that 12 16 cm RML were required for the class, but it's not clear whether all guns were replaced by the 16 cm RML.Propulsion
The Groningen class had machines of 250 nominal horsepower. When the Dutch shifted to using indicated horse power, the machines were measured at 700 indicated horse power. The machines for the Groningen were made by the Nederlandsche Stoombootmaatschappij in Feijenoord.Citadel van Antwerpen had machines made by Van Vlissingen en Dudok van Heel this was a Penn trunk engine of 250 hp. Citadel had two pairs of boilers placed back to back, capable of firing to 300 hp. Designed pressure was 15 kilogram per square inch.
Names
The ships were first named Groningen, Dordrecht and Leeuwarden. The initial idea might have been to name the ships of the class for the capitals of the 11 provinces. Dordrecht was not a provincial capital, but it was the home town of Secretary for the Navy Lotsy. He had been mayor of Dordrecht before being appointed as secretary in August 1856. In June 1857 the Dordrecht and Leeuwarden were renamed on account of the 25 year remembrance of the Siege_of_Antwerp_. The medal instituted on account of the siege would be part of the ornamentation of the stern of the Citadel van AntwerpenRebuild
Both the Citadel van Antwerpen and the Vice-Admiraal Koopman would undergo such extensive repairs that these amounted to a rebuild. This was probably the moment that the armament was changed, and one or both of the ships were lengthened.On 2 August 1864 the Citadel van Antwerpen anchored before Flushing with a defect in the screw. On 21 November 1864 the Citadel was brought into the dry-dock in Flushing for inspection. The results were not good. On 19 February 1865 workmen started to tow the Citadel onto the slipway. Soon after there was talk of 'very big repairs'. She would stay on the slipway for more than 3 years.
On 4 July 1868 the Citadel van Antwerpen was launched a second time from the Rijkswerf in Flushing. On 7 July she was brought into the drydock to be coppered. On 21 August the paddle-steamer Valk arrived to bring the Citadel to Willemsoord, where she would be completed. Their departure on 26 August marked the start of the evacuation of the Rijkswerf Vlissingen. While under tow a storm hit the ships. The Citadel could not use its engine and was lucky to be blown into the harbor. In September 1869 the Citadel was said to leave for Amsterdam to be finished there. In July 1870 she was registered as a reserve, with 13 guns and 175 men. The Citadel van Antwerpen arrived in Flushing on 14 August 1870, meaning she was finally back in service in 1870.
On 23 March 1865 the Vice Admiraal Koopman arrived back in Flushing from the Dutch East Indies. On 15 April 1865 the Koopman was decommissioned. In mid-January the Koopman went into the dry-dock and their wer rumors of big repairs. When she was brought out of the dry-dock there was only talk of a completed reparation. On 4 May 1866 the Koopman was towed on the slipway in Flushing. On 4 April 1867 the Koopman was launched again. On 24 June 1867 the Koopman left Flushing under tow by the Valk. On board were workmen of the yard, who would be moved to Amsterdam, and also the machinery to armor ships. The Koopman was to be fitted out in Amstrerdam, and arrived in Nieuwediep on 30 June 1867.
Construction
Of the 3 ships 1 was built by the private yard of Fop Smit in Kinderdijk. The two others were built at the Rijkswerf in Amsterdam.Name | Built by | Laid down | Launched | Commissioned | Fate |
Fop Smit, Kinderdijk | 1855 | 9 April 1857 | 1 July 1857 | 29 September 1863 unfit | |
Rijkswerf Amsterdam | 19 February 1856 | 1857 | 11 April 1858 | ||
Rijkswerf Amsterdam | 18 October 1856 | 29 April 1858 | 6 September 1858 | August 1876 decommissioned |