Convocation of 1563
The Convocation of 1563 was a significant gathering of English and Welsh clerics that consolidated the Elizabethan religious settlement, and brought the Thirty-Nine Articles close to their final form. It was, more accurately, the Convocation of 1562/3 of the province of Canterbury, beginning in January 1562.
Summary
who was Archbishop of Canterbury had prepared documents outlining further reform in the Church of England, as had other bishops. A more thorough-going reform agenda was supported by over 30 of the participants. A compromise version, the "six articles", was narrowly defeated on a vote. The result was that the momentum for reform of the Church by its constitutional procedures was halted. Parker steered the outcome towards the via media. "Swiss-inspired reformists" were headed off.The Convocation restored the position of the Thirty-Nine Articles in the Church of England. More accurately said, the Forty-Two Articles of Edward VI were reduced to a draft at this point, which was widely supported, and eventually enforced after 1571. There were further proposals from reformers, in particular on canon law and liturgy, some of which originated from a group among the bishops. These, however, proved contentious, and did not pass. Subsequent contestation of the same issues made some of them a matter of authority.
Collinson comments that
Moves to improve the settlement in the convocation of 1563 were led by the bishops rather than by 'Puritans' in the lower house
Dawley writes that probably the surprise of the Convocation
was not the amount of support given to the Precisians but the unexpected extent of loyalty to the existing regulations,
"Precisian" being the term used by Parker for his opponents on the issue of clerical dress.
Participants
Bishops
Of 20 bishops of the time, there were 12 who had left the Kingdom of England under Mary Tudor: the "Marian exiles". Of those who had remained, some had done so covertly.Name | Exile? | See | Comments |
Gilbert Berkeley | Frankfurt | Bath and Wells | |
Richard Cheyney | No | Bristol, Gloucester | Did not subscribe the 39 articles |
Matthew Parker | No | Canterbury | |
William Barlow | Germany, Poland, Emden | Chichester | |
Thomas Bentham | Zurich, Basle | Coventry and Lichfield | |
Richard Cox | Frankfurt | Ely | Probably a reforming bishop |
William Alley | No | Exeter | drafts |
John Scory | Emden | Hereford | |
Nicholas Bullingham | Emden | Lincoln | |
Edmund Grindal | Frankfurt | London | Reformer, supported attempts to revise the Prayer Book rubrics. |
John Parkhurst | Zurich | Norwich | |
Edmund Scambler | London | Peterborough | |
Edmund Gheast | No | Rochester | drafting of article XXIX |
John Jewel | Strasbourg, Zürich, Padua | Salisbury | |
Robert Horne | Zurich, Frankfurt, Strasburg | Winchester | |
Edwin Sandys | Frankfurt, Augsburg, Strasbourg, Zürich | Worcester | Draft on the sign of the cross in baptism |
Rowland Meyrick | No | Bangor | |
Hugh Jones, as proxy | No | Llandaff | |
Thomas Davies | No | St. Asaph | |
Richard Davies | Geneva | St. David's |
Of these bishops, 19 attended at the start—not Jones, who was acting as proxy for the aged Anthony Kitchin.