The barn door tracker was created by George Haig. His plans were first published in Sky & Telescope magazine in April 1975. Modified versions of the tracker were published in the magazine's February 1988 and June 2007 editions. In late 2002 and early 2003, NASA astronautDon Pettit, part of International Space StationExpedition 6, constructed a barn door tracker using spare parts he had accumulated from around the space station, permitting sharper high resolution images of city lights at night from the ISS.
Mount design alternatives
A simple single-arm barn door tracker can be made by attaching two pieces of wood together with a hinge. A camera is mounted on the top board, usually with some sort of ball joint to allow the camera to be pointed in any direction. The hinge is aligned with a celestial pole and the boards are then driven apart at a constant rate, usually by turning a threaded rod or bolt. This is called a tangent drive. This type of mount is good for approximately 5–10 minutes before tracking errors become evident when using a 50 mm lens. This is due to the tangent error. That length of time can be increased to about 20 minutes when using an isosceles mount. A curved drive bolt in lieu of either a straight tangent or isosceles mount will greatly extend the useful tracking time. These designs were further improved upon by Dave Trott, whose designs were published in the February 1988 issue of Sky & Telescope. By using a second arm to drive the camera platform - making fabrication slightly less simple - tracking accuracy is greatly increased, allowing exposure times of up to one hour. The most accurate of these designs is Type-4. A modified double arm design minimizes tangent error by raising the point of rotation of the arm on which the camera is mounted. This has the effect of tilting the arc traced by the camera arm backwards causing it to follow a better path. A basic geometrical analysis of the tangent error shows that it can be fully compensated for by inserting a specially shaped piece between the threaded rod and the top board. Such solution was already known for a long time before the original G. Haig publication. The most basic of these designs are manually operated, even though an optional electric motor or stepper motor automates and improves the accuracy of tracking, while considerably reducing the likelihood of platform vibrations that could result from manipulating the device; i.e., manually advancing the drive rod.
Double arm (Type 4) design and building plans
Reportedly, Dave Trott's two-arm Type 4 design can potentially reduce trailing error to 1 arc second per hour, allowing for very long trail-less exposures, even in combination with long lenses. Parts of the original article describing this mount can be found in, but, apparently detailed building project have never been published. Ideally, this drive requires a 1 RPM stepper motor, however, for shorter exposures on a stable platform, a well designed Type 4 barn-door tracker produces very acceptable results manually advancing the drive in small, sequential steps in order to achieve one full revolution per minute. Detailed 1:1 building plans for the design featured in the above image can be found A key modification of the original design is the hinged suspension of the drive rod -- which avoids binding --, as well as a central tripod mount that can be moved along the supporting truss tubes to better balance for lighter or heavier loads according to their orientation. For proper polar alignment, a 3-way tripod or azimuth wedge is required. The latter is not included in the current design plans.
